In an era where the boundaries between reality and simulation blur, outdoor sculptures offer a tangible counterpoint to the abstract notions of the simulation hypothesis. These physical artworks, rooted in materiality and space, provoke questions about perception, existence, and the nature of reality. Unlike digital simulations, sculptures occupy a fixed, unalterable presence—resisting the fluidity of virtual worlds.

Artists like Anish Kapoor and Richard Serra create works that demand physical interaction, grounding viewers in the "real" world. Their massive steel curves or mirrored surfaces distort reflections, subtly echoing the simulation debate: Is what we see an accurate representation or a constructed illusion? Public sculptures also endure weathering, decay, and human touch, embodying impermanence—a stark contrast to the pristine, editable realms of simulations.

Yet, some contemporary sculptors embrace digital tools to design pieces that mimic glitches or pixelation, bridging the gap between physical and simulated realities. These hybrid works challenge audiences to reconsider where art—and by extension, reality—begins and ends. Ultimately, outdoor sculptures serve as both rebuttals and companions to the simulation hypothesis, anchoring abstract philosophy in visceral experience.